<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <atom:link href="http://kulsa.yolasite.com/blog.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <title>blog</title>
        <description>blog</description>
        <link>http://kulsa.yolasite.com/blog.php</link>
        <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2026 20:52:07 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>FeedCreator 1.7.2</generator>
        <item>
            <title>Right to life!!!</title>
            <link>http://kulsa.yolasite.com/blog/right-to-life-</link>
            <description>&lt;img class=&quot;yui-img&quot; src=&quot;http://kulsa.yolasite.com/resources/julius.jpg&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;u&gt;Article 26 of the draft constitution provides that...&lt;br&gt;Right to life
&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
26. (1) Every person has the right to life.
&lt;br&gt;&amp;nbsp;
(2) The life of a person begins at conception.
&lt;br&gt;&amp;nbsp;
(3) A person shall not be deprived of life intentionally, except to the extent
&lt;br&gt;&amp;nbsp; authorized by this Constitution or other written law.
&lt;br&gt;&amp;nbsp;
(4) Abortion is not permitted unless, in the opinion of a trained health
&lt;br&gt;&amp;nbsp;
professional, there is need for emergency treatment, or the life or health of
&lt;br&gt;&amp;nbsp;
the mother is in danger, or if permitted by any other written law.
&lt;br&gt;

&lt;br&gt;
Life is divine and should be protected at all costs. Liberal abortion
should never be enshrined in the supreme law of any land. This has been
captured in the first clause of Article 26(1), which in my own esteemed
opinion is hallowed. The fact that the law in Article 26 (2), which
enhances the God-given power of procreation! &lt;br&gt;

&lt;br&gt;
The function of Article 26(3) is seemingly to deal with capital
punishment, ( which surprisingly the Church is not opposed to). However,
by the provision of the preceding two provisions, this section is
somehow superfluous since the right of an individual has been protected
by the two provisions. &lt;br&gt;

&lt;br&gt;
As regards to section 4 of this article, the learned experts on
constitutional affairs incorporated this provision in the draft, as a
mirror on reality. Whether we like it or not, abortion is being
practiced in the back streets, and we are not ignorant as to this grave
fact. And a close check into reality seems like the society is up in
arms ratifying the act!! for example, in a strictly religious
institution, what happens to two students who conceives. Supposing one
carries the baby to term and the other aborts? Who gets the boot? I
wish to say it is rather obvious. Lets take it was members of a church
choir? Who would the pastor retain in the choir? &lt;br&gt;

&lt;br&gt;
Finally, I wish to echo the sentiments of my mentor, Mr. Kamotho
Waiganjo, that abortion is a poverty issue. The rich can easily corrupt
to have the abortion license. What happens to the poor woman upcountry
who can not afford to raise the kid and opts to abort? She will definitely go to the back streets. We also need to be conversant of
this fact
&lt;br&gt;

</description>
            <pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 20:32:40 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>
